Vant Underrättelse AB builds sovereign blockchain investigation infrastructure for European institutions. In partnership with Luleå University of Technology (LTU), we develop next-generation tools for transparent, compliant, and independent blockchain forensics aligned with GDPR, AI Act, and MiCA regulations.
Today, European law enforcement and financial regulators depend on US-controlled blockchain analysis platforms hosted outside European jurisdiction. This creates a critical gap: investigative data sovereignty, interpretive autonomy, and regulatory compliance are compromised. VANT restores European institutional independence by delivering blockchain investigation infrastructure that remains under European control, with models and methodologies auditable against European legal standards.
Secure, offline-capable investigation appliances for public forces. Complete data sovereignty. Zero external dependencies. Investigations conducted on European infrastructure.
AML/CTF compliance infrastructure for institutions bound by MiCA and GDPR. Institutional-grade investigation workflows. Regulatory audit trails. Multi-jurisdiction reporting.
Real-time transaction flagging and compliance reporting for blockchain-native platforms. Web3-aligned settlement. 24/7 operational agility. Regulatory reporting automation.
Collaborative R&D with Luleå University of Technology. Dissemination of anonymized case studies. Talent pipeline development. Knowledge transfer between practitioners and researchers.
We grow through institutional partnerships and credible results, not market hype. Strategic positioning over rapid scaling. Trusted by regulators and academics. Reserved about competitive strategy.
Arctic infrastructure advantage. Nordic institutional credibility. Positioned as European sovereign alternative to US-dominated blockchain SaaS. Contributing to EU digital autonomy.
"VANT does not sell software. It restores European institutional autonomy over digital investigation."
Luleå University of Technology Collaboration: Our R&D is conducted within an institutional research framework, ensuring academic rigor and compliance oversight. This partnership differentiates VANT from commercial blockchain vendors and positions us as a credible partner for regulatory bodies and institutional investors.
Funding & Support: VANT is advancing through competitive EU funding mechanisms (Vinnova, Horizon Europe). This validates both our technical approach and market viability through independent expert review.
The Challenge: European institutions currently have no sovereign alternative to US blockchain investigation platforms. Our Response: Build institutional-grade, compliant, European-controlled blockchain investigation infrastructure. The Impact: European investigative independence, regulatory alignment, and strategic autonomy in digital investigation.
Blockchain investigations require institutional independence. Currently, law enforcement agencies depend on commercial platforms that operate outside European control, creating compliance and sovereignty concerns. Investigation data transits through non-European infrastructure, and investigative methodologies remain proprietary and non-auditable.
Investigations remain on secure, institutional infrastructure. Zero data egress. Complete isolation from external networks when required.
Conduct investigations in classified environments without external dependencies. Suitable for sensitive national security cases.
Every investigation step is logged and auditable. Results hold up in court. Compliance with GDPR and emerging AI Act requirements.
Investigation criteria, methodology, and reporting are configured locally. No reliance on external vendors for investigative judgment.
Traditional banking institutions require robust blockchain investigation capabilities to meet AML/CTF compliance mandates. At the same time, stringent data residency and processing regulations demand infrastructure that operates within European jurisdictions while maintaining full auditability and regulatory alignment.
Built for MiCA, GDPR, and AML/CTF frameworks. Investigation workflows align with institutional compliance obligations. Audit trails meet regulatory expectations.
Investigation data remains within institutional jurisdiction. No compliance conflicts with EU data protection regulations. Multi-jurisdiction reporting simplified.
Depth of analysis meets institutional risk management standards. Explainable results. Audit-ready documentation for regulatory reviews.
On-premises deployment means investigation capacity scales with internal resources, not SaaS subscription costs. Transparent economics.
Blockchain-native platforms require real-time transaction monitoring, immediate compliance flagging, and continuous regulatory reporting. Traditional SaaS tools are designed for batch investigation, not real-time streaming. Latency, cost per transaction, and lack of Web3-aligned settlement mechanics create operational friction.
Transaction flagging happens at network speed. Compliance alerts are immediate. False positive tuning is local and rapid.
Blockchain operates 24/7. Investigation infrastructure must match. No SaaS dependencies during critical incidents.
Reports flow directly from platform infrastructure. Regulatory filings are continuous, not batch-driven. Compliance reporting is native to operations.
Built for blockchain infrastructure realities. On-chain settlement, multi-chain support, and cross-protocol investigation capabilities.
VANT is not a generic blockchain tool. It is purpose-built for the distinct needs of three institutional segments: law enforcement seeking data sovereignty, banks navigating regulatory complexity, and blockchain platforms requiring operational agility. Each segment receives investigation infrastructure tailored to their specific requirements, compliance framework, and operational reality.
VANT follows a measured, institution-first approach to development and deployment. We prioritize regulatory compliance, academic rigor, and operational maturity over rapid market expansion. Detailed technical milestones and deployment timelines are reserved for institutional partners and funding discussions.